The Subject Of The Contract Is The Renovation Of The Facade And The Replacement Of External Doors In The Oni Building. The Values Presented In The Bill Of Quantities Serve Auxiliary Purposes When Calculating The Price Of The Offer, While The Price Offered By The Contractor Is A Flat -Rate Price, And Therefore Should Take Into Account All Expenditure That Is Necessary To Perform The Subject Of The Contract Described In Swz. 1. The Detailed Scope Of Construction Works And The Manner Of Implementing The Pre -Order Object Was Determined In The Pre -Emptive Of Works, Technical Specification Of The Execution And Acceptance Of Works, Construction And Executive Design, Constituting An Attachment To Swz.2. Trademarks, Own Names, Etc. Indicated In The Documents - Constitute Only A Quality, Functional, Technical And Technological Pattern Regarding The Subject Of The Contract. In All Cases, In Which, Due To The Specification Of The Subject Of The Contract, The Origin, Names Of Materials, Devices, Or Their Origin Were Indicated, The Use Of Materials, Equivalent Devices, I.E. All Materials Listed From The Name, Devices Used In The Documentation Provided By The Contracting Authority Or Their Origin, Serve Only To Determine The Standard And Can Be Replaced By Other Technical, Functional, Functional, And Quality, Quality, Aesthetic Values, Taking Into Account The Proper Cooperation With Other Materials And Devices. The Names Used In The Order Documentation, Which Indicate Or Could Be Associated With The Manufacturer Or Company, Are Not Intended To Prefer The Solutions Of A Given Manufacturer, But To Indicate A Solution That Should Have Technical, Technological Features No Worse Than Those Given In The Technical Documentation. The Contracting Authority In The Case Of Offers Containing Equivalent Solutions Will Be Verified In Terms Of Meeting The Requirements Of Individual Items Of Technical Requirements Contained In The Attachments To The Specification. The Contractor Is Obliged To Prove The Equivalence Of The Offered Devices Or Systems In The Offer. The Burden Of Proving Equivalence Is The Contractors Responsibility. The Employer Will Not Recognize Equivalent Solutions If They Are Worse Than Those Indicated In The Attachments To The Minimum Quality Specifications Of Qualitative, Functional, Technical And Technological Requirements. 3. The Listed Names Of The Manufacturers (If They Appear) Were Used Only For Example. Possibly The Indicated Names Of The Products And Their Manufacturers Are Not Aimed At Violating The Principle Of Fair Competition And Equal Treatment Of Contractors. Wherever They Are Indicated, You Should Read In Such A Way That They Are Accompanied By The Term Or Equivalent. By The Concept Of Or Equivalent, The Contracting Authority Understands The Offering Of Materials Guaranteeing The Implementation Of The Task Ensuring Obtaining Technical Parameters Not Worse Than The Documents Assumed In The Above -Mentioned Documents. The Application Of Equiv
We takes all possible care for accurate & authentic tender information, however Users are requested to refer Original source of Tender Notice / Tender Document published by Tender Issuing Agency before taking any call regarding this tender.
