3 A Detailed Description Of The Subject Of The Contract Can Be Found In Annex 6 To Swz.2. The Employer Does Not Allow The Submission Of Variant Offers And In The Form Of Electronic Catalogs. 3. The Employer Does Not Provide For The Awarding Of Orders Referred To In Art. 214 Para. 1 Point 7 Of The Pzp.4 Act. A Detailed Description And Manner Of The Contract Can Be Found In The Description Of The Subject Of The Contract, Which Is An Attachment To Swz.5. Names And Codes According To A Joint Order Dictionary (Cpv) 16700000 - 2 Tractors43250000 - 0 Front Chargers34390000 - 7 Accessories For Tractors6. Justification Of Failure To Divide The Order Into Parts. The Order Of The Order Is Lower Than The So -Called Eu Thresholds That Oblige To Implement The Eu Directives. Directive 2014/24/Eu In The Content Of The Motif 78 Indicates That In Order To Increase Competition, The Contracting Institutions Should Be In Particular Encouraged To Divide Large Parts Into Parts. The Contract In Question Is Not A Large Order Within The Meaning Of The Motif 78 Of The Eu Directive Cited (The Directive Is Used From The So -Called Eu Thresholds, And The Directive Uses The Concept Of A Large Order On The Basis Of Orders Subject To The Directive - And Thus Orders With A Value Significantly Exceeding The So -Called Eu Thresholds). The Order Has Not Been Divided Into Parts For The Following Reasons: A) The Subject Of The Contract Is The Performance Of One Type Of Supply. Airplanting Them Would Threaten Not To Eliminate Organizational Problems Related To Responsibility For Individual Elements Of Supplies Made By Various Contractors. B) The Division Of The Subject Of The Order Into Tasks Would Threaten A Significant Increase In Costs And Technological Difficulties Resulting From The Performance Of The Subject Of The Contract By A Larger Number Of Contractors. C) Contractors Would Duplicate Indirect Costs Work, Which Would Affect The Costs Of The Entire Subject Of The Contract. In Each Of The Partial Offers, The Contractor Would Have To Set Up A Separate Valuation Of The Use Of The Same Type Of Equipment In A Situation In Which, When Submitting One Offer, The Use Of Equipment Would Be Valued Once. In The Event Of Division Into Parts, The Contractors Would Duplicate The Costs Of, Among Others Hr Costs, Equipment Maintenance, Such As Insurance, Operating Costs Or Fuel Costs, Which Would Adversely Affect The Contracting Authority. To Sum Up, The Contracting Authority Did Not Divide The Order Into Parts Due To The Fact That Such A Division Would Threaten Excessive Technical Difficulties And Excessive Costs Of Performing The Contract. The Need To Coordinate The Activities Of Various Contractors Carrying Out Individual Parts Of The Order Could Seriously Threaten The Proper Performance Of The Order. Failure To Divide The Order Was Therefore Dictated By Technical, Organizational, Economic Reasons And The Nature Of The Subject Of The Contract. Possibly The Division Of The Order Into Parts W
We takes all possible care for accurate & authentic tender information, however Users are requested to refer Original source of Tender Notice / Tender Document published by Tender Issuing Agency before taking any call regarding this tender.
